Back to Slip Maps for Recent Large Earthquakes home page
© 2004 Tectonics Observatory :: California Institute of Technology :: all rights reserved

Preliminary Result
01/13/2007 (Mw 8.1), Kuril islands

Anthony Sladen, Caltech

Location of Epicenter

Amount of Slip on Fault

View in Google Earth (requires Google Earth)

Colors show the amount of slip on diferent sections of the fault zone. Two views are shown (either view can be de-selected on the Google Earth sidebar):

  1. Circles show a 3-D map of the fault. (The fault map has been raised above the Earth's surface. Click on a circle to get the depth of that fault segment.)

  2. Image shows the projection of the fault onto the Earth's surface.

DATA Process and Inversion

We used the GSN broadband data downloaded from the IRIS DMC. We analyzed 24 teleseismic P waveforms selected based upon data quality and azimuthal distribution. Waveforms are first converted to displacement by removing the instrument response and then used to constrain the slip history based on a finite fault inverse algorithm (Ji et al, 2002). We use the epicenter location of the USGS (Lon.=154.455° Lat.=46.272° Depth=12 km). The dip (58°) and strike (42°) angles are taken from the GCMT solution. The 1D velocity model is extracted from the CRUST2.0 global tomography model (Bassin et al., 2000). A fast velocity (~3.8 km/sec.) provides a better fit to the waveforms than more standard rupture velocities (2-3km/sec.).

Result

The solution is made of three slip patches with most of the slip occurring up-dip of the epicenter (Figure 1) and stretched parallel to the trench over approximately 180 km. The slip is oriented normal to the strike of the fault. As can be seen from the seismograms (Figure 2) and the inverted source time function (Figure 3), the energy of the earthquake was mainly released in two episodes, at 5 and 25 seconds.

Cross-section of slip distribution



Figure 1: The big black arrow shows the fault's strike. The colors show the slip amplitude and white arrows indicate the direction of motion of the hanging wall relative to the footwall. Contours show the rupture initiation time and the red star indicates the hypocenter location.

Comparison of data and synthetic seismograms




Figure 2: The Data are shown in black and the synthetic seismograms are plotted in red. Both data and synthetic seismograms are aligned on the P arrivals. The number at the end of each trace is the peak amplitude of the observation in micro-meter. The number above the beginning of each trace is the source azimuth and below it is the epicentral distance.

Map view of the slip distribution



Figure 3: Surface projection of the slip distribution. The small black dots represent two months of aftershocks (USGS-NEIC determination). The bathymetric contours are plotted in light grey every 1000 meters.

Comments:




Download

SUBFAULT FORMAT CMTSOLUTION FORMAT SOURCE TIME FUNCTION

References

Bassin, C., Laske, G. and Masters, G., The Current Limits of Resolution for Surface Wave Tomography in North America, EOS Trans AGU, 81, F897, 2000.

Ji, C., D.J. Wald, and D.V. Helmberger, Source description of the 1999 Hector Mine, California earthquake; Part I: Wavelet domain inversion theory and resolution analysis, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., Vol 92, No. 4. pp. 1192-1207, 2002.

GCMT project: http://www.globalcmt.org/

USGS National Earthquake Information Center: http://neic.usgs.gov

Global Seismographic Network (GSN) is a cooperative scientific facility operated jointly by the Incorporated Research Institutions for Seismology (IRIS), the United States Geological Survey (USGS), and the National Science Foundation (NSF).
‹Back to Slip Maps for Recent Large Earthquakes home page
© 2004 Tectonics Observatory :: California Institute of Technology :: all rights reserved