Preliminary Result
11/14/2007 (Mw 7.7) , Tocopilla Earthquake, Chile
A. Sladen, Caltech
DATA Process and Inversion
We used the GSN broadband data downloaded from the IRIS DMC. We analyzed 33 teleseismic
P waveforms and 5 teleseismic SH waveforms selected based upon data quality and azimuthal
distribution. Waveforms are first converted to displacement by removing the instrument
response and then used to constrain the slip history based on a finite fault
inverse algorithm (Ji et al, 2002). We use the epicenter of the USGS (Lon.=-69.809° Lat.=-22.178°), and the GCMT solution to determine the dip (20°). The crust model at the source is taken from Bassin et al. (2000).
Result
.
Cross-section of slip distribution
Figure: The big black arrow shows the fault's strike. The colors show the slip
amplitude and white arrows indicate the direction of motion of the hanging wall
relative to the footwall. Contours show the rupture initiation time and the red
star indicates the hypocenter location. The rupture velocity is about 1.6 km/s,
and the total seismic moment 5.92e20 N.m (Mw=7.7).
Comparison of data and synthetic seismograms
Figure: The Data are shown in black and the synthetic seismograms are plotted
in red. Both data and synthetic seismograms are aligned on the P arrivals.
The number at the end of each trace is the peak amplitude of the observation
in micro-meter. The number above the beginning of each trace is the source azimuth
and below it is the epicentral distance.
Map view of the slip distribution
Figure: Surface projection of the slip distribution. The solution is dominated by a 3.5 m slip patch at the hypocenter, and two other continuous slip patch further south. Black contours of the slip distribution are every 100 cm, and grey contours every 50 cm.
Download
(Slip Distribution)
References
Ji, C., D.J. Wald, and D.V. Helmberger, Source description of the 1999 Hector
Mine, California earthquake; Part I: Wavelet domain inversion theory and resolution
analysis, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., Vol 92, No. 4. pp. 1192-1207, 2002.
Bassin, C., Laske, G. and Masters, G., The Current Limits of Resolution for
Surface Wave Tomography in North America, EOS Trans AGU, 81, F897, 2000.
GCMT project: http://www.globalcmt.org/
USGS National Earthquake Information Center: http://neic.usgs.gov
Global Seismographic Network (GSN) is a cooperative scientific facility operated jointly by the Incorporated Research Institutions for Seismology (IRIS), the United States Geological Survey (USGS), and the National Science Foundation (NSF).
|