Back to Slip Maps for Recent Large Earthquakes home page

Preliminary Result
3/11/2011 (Mw 9.0), Tohoku-oki, Japan

Shengji Wei (Caltech) and Anthony Sladen (Geoazur-CNRS)

Location of Epicenter

Amount of Slip on Fault

View in Google Earth (requires Google Earth)

Colors show the amount of slip on different sections of the fault zone. Two views are shown (either view can be de-selected on the Google Earth sidebar):

  1. Circles show a 3-D map of the fault. (The fault map has been raised above the Earth's surface. Click on a circle to get the depth of that fault segment.)

  2. Image shows the projection of the fault onto the Earth's surface.


Overview

slip map of 2011 Tohoku-oki earthquake The Tohoku-oki earthquake is located at the boundary between the Pacific plate and the North American plates. These plates are converging at about 8 cm/year.

The rectangle in the figure shows the location and length of the rupture zone. The red star indicates the epicenter. The rupture was bilateral, i.e., it spread away from the epicenter in both the north and south directions, taking about 2 minutes to cover a total of 400 km (250 miles). This magnitude 9.0 earthquake was more than 500 times stronger than the Haiti earthquake of January 2010.

The colors show the slip amplitude (i.e., the amount by which the land on one side of the fault moved with respect to the land on the other side). The motion was mainly thrust-fault (Pacific plate subducting under land on the North American plate - see animation).

The rupture originated about 20 km (13 miles) below the surface. In some places, the slippage along the fault was as large as 30 meters (100 feet), shown by red-shaded areas.


UPDATE: New solution combining teleseismic and GPS data available here.




DATA Process and Inversion

We used the GSN broadband data downloaded from the IRIS DMC. We analyzed 20 teleseismic P waveforms and 18 SH waveforms selected based upon data quality and azimuthal distribution. Waveforms are first converted to displacement by removing the instrument response and then used to constrain the slip history based on a finite fault inverse algorithm (Ji et al, 2002). The epicenter location is based on the JMA estimate (Lon.=142.8 ° Lat.=38.05 °). The dip angle is taken from the GCMT solution (dip=9 °) and the 1D velocity model is extracted from the CRUST2.0 global tomography model (Bassin et al., 2000). The strike of the fault plane (strike=201 °) was adjusted to match the orientation of the subduction zone in the are of maximum slip.


Result

The solution is made of one main slip patch updip of the epicenter. Two other major slip patches are located down-dip of the epicenter and south of the epicenter. The latter patch suggests that the bilateral rupture was stronger to the south.

Cross-section of slip distribution



Figure 1: The colors show the slip amplitude and white arrows indicate the direction of motion of the hanging wall relative to the footwall. Contours correspond to the propagation of the rupture front, and the red star indicates the hypocenter location. The big black arrow gives the orientation of the fault plane.


Comparison of data and synthetic seismograms





Figure 2: The Data are shown in black and the synthetic seismograms are plotted in red. Data are aligned on the theoretical P-wave arrival (IASPEI earth model). The number at the end of each trace is the peak amplitude of the observation in micro-meter. The number above the beginning of each trace is the source azimuth and below it is the epicentral distance.


Map view of the slip distribution



Figure 3: Surface projection of the fault plane slip distribution. The red star represents the epicenter of this event. The grey dots are the aftershocks located by USGS during the day following the event. The inset correspond to the source time function.

Comments:



Download

(Slip Distribution)

SUBFAULT FORMAT CMTSOLUTION FORMAT SOURCE TIME FUNCTION


References

Ji, C., D.J. Wald, and D.V. Helmberger, Source description of the 1999 Hector Mine, California earthquake; Part I: Wavelet domain inversion theory and resolution analysis, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., Vol 92, No. 4. pp. 1192-1207, 2002.

Bassin, C., Laske, G. and Masters, G., The Current Limits of Resolution for Surface Wave Tomography in North America, EOS Trans AGU, 81, F897, 2000.

GCMT project: http://www.globalcmt.org/

USGS National Earthquake Information Center: http://neic.usgs.gov

Japanese Meteorological Agency (JMA) http://www.jma.go.jp

Global Seismographic Network (GSN) is a cooperative scientific facility operated jointly by the Incorporated Research Institutions for Seismology (IRIS), the United States Geological Survey (USGS), and the National Science Foundation (NSF).

‹Back to Slip Maps for Recent Large Earthquakes home page
© 2004 Tectonics Observatory :: California Institute of Technology :: all rights reserved